Konstruksi Realitas Multiportal: Agenda Setting dan Framing Humas Pemerintah Dalam Distribusi Informasi di Era Media Digital

(STUDI KASUS DI DISKOMINFOTIK NTB)

  • I Wayan Sudiartawan Alumni IAHN Gde Pudja Mataram
  • Ida Bagus Made Arjana Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Gde Pudja Mataram
Keywords: Humas Pemerintah, Komunikasi Digital, Agenda Setting, Framing, Multiplatform Media

Abstract

Digital transformation is forcing government public relations to evolve from one-way information dissemination to sophisticated multi-platform engagement. However, a critical gap exists between strategic potential and practical implementation, particularly in resource-constrained contexts. This research aims to deconstruct multi-platform framing strategies and identify drivers and barriers to their execution. A case study approach was employed, utilizing triangulation through semi-structured interviews with PR officers, non-participant observation of social media activity, and documentary analysis of content from official platforms. The findings reveal a critical paradox that demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of multi-platform framing, strategically tailoring government messaging to emphasize distinct attributes of multi-portal reality construction practices. However, these strategies are hampered by resource gaps, leading to agenda rationing and reliance on other departments for content. Furthermore, these strategies remain largely one-way broadcasts, resulting in a striking engagement paradox where high follower numbers do not translate into meaningful public interactions, as citizen data indicates a preference for more entertaining content. This research contributes a Multiportal Agenda-Setting Model that illustrates the dynamic, limited process of government communication within a fragmented media ecology.

References

APJII. (2023). Survey Internet APJII 2022-2023. https://survei.apjii.or.id/survei
Artini, N. N. P. (2022). Komunikasi Organisasi Kemahasiswaan di Kota Mataram. Sadharananikarana: Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi Hindu, 4(2), 738–750. https://doi.org/10.53977/sadharananikarana.v4i2.831
carahsoft.com. (2018). The State of Social Media in Government in 2018. https://static.carahsoft.com/concrete/files/5215/2484/2022/Hootsuite-State-of-Social-Media-in-Government-2018.pdf
Civelek, M. E., Cemberci, M., & Eralp, N. E. (2016). The Role of Social Media in Crisis Communication and Crisis Management. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 5(3). https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v5i3.279
DataReportal. (2024). Digital 2024: Indonesia. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-indonesia
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Graham, M. W., Avery, E. J., & Park, S. (2015). The role of social media in local government crisis communications. Public Relations Review, 41(3), 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.02.001
Grunig, J. E. (2009). Paradigms of global public relations in an age of digitalisation. PRism, 6(2).
Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media and Society, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952
Kominfo. (2022). Laporan Evaluasi Media Sosial Pemerintah Daerah. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. https://ppid.kemendagri.go.id/storage/dokumen/8u4mvwMvHSvz8i7ryLlUQzzxiANbDZiIdSmuQsDg.pdf
Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. The Communication of Ideas, 1948.
Liu, Y., & Chan, R. H. (2018). The Framework of Crisis‐Induced Agenda Setting in China. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 5(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.220
McCombs, M. E. (2005). The Agenda-Setting Function of the Press. In The Press.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
Mirlina, L. (2017). Role Of Social Media In The Government Communication. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 4. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2017vol4.2384
Saffer, A. J., Sommerfeldt, E. J., & Taylor, M. (2013). The effects of organizational Twitter interactivity on organization–public relationships. Public Relations Review, 39(3), 213–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.02.005
Sari, W. P., Putriana, M., Bachtera, R. A., Firdaus, M. R., Wihadi, A., Reyfaldi, R. A., Pamungkas, B. F., & Sadewo, R. (2025). Terpaan Media Sosial Tiktok Terhadap Tingkat Partisipasi Politik Mahasiswa Pada Pemilihan Presiden Indonesia Tahun 2024. Sadharananikarana: Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi Hindu, 6(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.53977/sadharananikarana.v6i1.1724
Sutama, I. W., & Putra, I. G. (2023). Optimalisasi Media Whatsapp Dalam Komunikasi Organisasi Sekaa Truna Truni (STT) Sastra Emas. Jurnal Pasupati, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.37428/pasupati.v9i2.326
UU No. 14 Tahun 2008 (2010). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/39047/uu-no-14-tahun-2008
Villalobos-López, J. A. (2022). Theoretical framework media and political economy of communication. Current Issues of Mass Communication, 31. https://doi.org/10.17721/cimc.2022.31.40-53
Wirdiata, I. M. S., & Sutama, I. W. (2023). Komunikasi Dan Perubahan Sosial Dalam Tradisi Pasidikaran Masyarakat Hindu Lombok. Samvada : Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, Media, Dan Public Relation, 2(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53977/jsv.v2i1.988
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. In Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research (Vol. 53, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108
Published
2025-11-28