Nominalisme dan Gugatannya terhadap Universalitas dalam Pemikiran Realisme Metafisik
Abstract
This article is based on qualitative research in the field of philosophy.
The data used in this study are literature data related to the research
object. The method of philosophical hermeneutics is used in the analysis
process by placing the perspective of nominalism as the formal object,
while the view of universality from the perspective of metaphysical
realism as the material object. The results of this research are as follows:
1) Nominalism is a metaphysical stream that rejects abstract and
universal entities, unlike the perspective of metaphysical realism which
refers to the Platonic scheme. 2) Nominalism places concepts as
theoretical constructions that must correspond to concrete experience,
rejecting the universal ideas held by realism. Nominalism emphasizes
that the attributes of concrete objects originate from the objects
themselves, not from universal entities. 3) Nominalism is related to
language issues. It emphasizes theoretical simplicity and rejects
excessive entities in articulating the similarity between objects.
References
Ruang Publik di Dalam Filsafat Politik Richard. MELINTAS, 24(1), 57-81.
Brandom, R. (2016). Sellars’s Metalinguistic Expressivist Nominalism. Sellars and his Legacy,
1-18.
Garcia, R. K. (2013). Platonism and the Haunted Universe. Loving God with Your. Moody
Publishers
Hall, D. (1980). Interpreting Plato's cave as an allegory of the human condition. Apeiron, 14(2),
74-86.
Ihuah, A. S., & Nor, Z. M. (2022). Metaphysical and Ontological Concepts. In The Palgrave
Handbook of African Traditional Religion (pp. 61-85). Cham: Springer International
Publishing.
Istvan, M. (2012). Nominalist analyses of an entity being charactered. Discusiones
Filosóficas, 13(21), 87-93.
Keuzenkamp, H. A., McAleer, M., & Zellner, A. (2002). The Enigma of Simplicity. Simplicity,
Inference and Modelling, 1-10.
Lazar, N. (2010). Ockham's Razor. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational
Statistics, 2(2), 243-246.
Lewis, D. K. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds (Vol. 322). Oxford: Blackwell.
Locke, J. (1847). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Kay & Troutman.
Loux, M. J., & Crisp, T. M. (2017). Metaphysics: A contemporary introduction. Taylor & Francis.
Melia, J. (2015). Nominalism, Naturalism and Natural Properties. In Nominalism about
Properties (pp. 175-188). Routledge.
Natoli, J., & Hutcheon, L. (Eds.). (1993). A Postmodern Reader. SUNY Press.
Okoro, C. (2011). Problems of Metaphysical Philosophy. African Nebula, (3), 113-139.
Prasetyo, A. G. (2013). Jurgen Habermas dan Analisis Kebijakan Kritis. Jurnal Politik Dan
Manajemen Publik, IV, 1.
Quine, W. V. (1948). On What There Is. The review of metaphysics, 21-38.
Russell, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479-493.
Santos, Beatriz. (2017). Predicate Reference and Metalinguistic Nominalism. British Journal of
Undergraduate Philosophy: 9.
