KOMUNIKASI INTERPRETATIF RUANG SAKRAL DALAM PEMAKNAAN GENERASI Z TERHADAP ISYARAT DESTINASI WISATA HINDU

  • Joko Prayitno Program Studi Perencanaan Kepariwisataan Universitas Mataram https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5976-9620
  • Putu Arya Reksa Anggratyas Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Gde Pudja Mataram
  • Ida Ayu Oka Suwati Sideman Universitas Mataram
Keywords: Generation Z, interpretive communication, sacred space, servicescape, Tri Hita Karana

Abstract

Hindu temples, as living places of worship and religious tourism destinations, require interpretive communication that enables visitors to understand sacredness without disrupting rituals or reducing them to tourism commodities. This study aims to examine how Generation Z interprets sacred spatial and ritual cues and to formulate an interpretive communication framework that prioritises sacredness and ritual order. This exploratory qualitative study analysed 91 written post-visit reflection narratives from Generation Z visitors across six sacred sites in Lombok using reflexive thematic analysis, informed by heritage interpretation, servicescape, and Tri Hita Karana perspectives. The findings show that water, trees, incense, prayer, architecture, and a quiet atmosphere are received as sacred cues that shift visitors’ orientation from routine fatigue toward reflective presence, stimulate context-dependent self-reflection, and resonate with respect for social tolerance and environmental sustainability. The findings also indicate that post-visit tranquillity does not automatically lead to lasting behavioural change; therefore, temples should not be promoted as spaces for instant healing. This study proposes a reception-based sacred interpretive communication framework linking spatial and ritual cues, Generation Z’s sensory-reflective reception, ethical-spiritual meaning-making, the legitimacy of pengempon as temple custodians, quiet interpretive media, and the protection of ritual solemnity. This framework extends the application of heritage interpretation and servicescape to temples as living sacred heritage by positioning sacredness, customary authority, and visitor ethics as the primary boundaries of destination communication.

References

Andrianto, T. and Kusumah, A. (2023) Interpretasi dan Teknik Pemanduan WIsata (Tourism Interpretation and Tour Guiding Technique).
Bhattacarya, W. and Riyanto, E.D. (2022) ‘Tri Mandala: Kearifan Lokal Bali dalam Pembagian Zonasi dan Ruang pada Bangunan Pura di Kabupaten Sidoarjo’, Sphatika: Jurnal Teologi, 13(1), pp. 108–119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25078/sphatika.v13i1.1272.
Darmateja, I.M.S. (2025) ‘Pengalaman Wisata Spiritual Melukat Pura Pabersihan Suranadi’, Jurnal Ilmiah Hospitality, 14(2), pp. 691–702. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47492/jih.v14i2.4008.
Darmateja, I.M.S. (2026) ‘Dampak Positif Aktivitas Wisata Spiritual Melukat Di Pura Pabersihan Suranadi Bagi Kesejahteraan Individu Wisatawan’, Paryaṭaka : Jurnal Pariwisata Budaya dan Keagamaan, 4(2), pp. 37–49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53977/pyt.v4i2.3797.
Harnish, D. (2021) ‘Tolerance of Ambiguity: Negotiating Religion and Sustaining the Lingsar Festival and Its Performing Arts in Lombok, Indonesia’, Religions, 12(8), p. 626. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12080626.
Jayaningsih, A.A. and Anggreswari, N. (2023) ‘Analisis Hermeneutika dalam Konsep Tri Hita Karana’, COMMUNICARE, 4, p. 1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.55115/communicare.v4i1.3379.
Poria, Y., Butler, R. and Airey, D. (2003) ‘Tourism, Religion and Religiosity: A Holy Mess’, Tourism Research, 6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500308667960.
Prayitno, J., & M. (2024) ‘Komunikasi Pariwisata di Kawasan Pura Suranadi dalam Mendukung Suranadi sebagai Desa Wisata Budaya’, Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, Media, dan Public Relation Samvada, 3(1), pp. 63–79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53977/jsv.v3i1.1800.
Prayitno, Joko , Reksa, S. (2026) ‘Tirtha Yatra Generasi Z Hindu Lombok Antara Tradisi Keluarga, Fungsi Ritual, Dan Aksesibilitas’, JRTour Journal Of Responsible Tourism, 6(1), pp. 101–112. Available at: https://ejournal.stpmataram.ac.id/JRT/article/view/4169/3188.
Prayitno, J. and Harianti, D. (2025) ‘Komunikasi Spiritual Dalam Pemertahanan Kesucian Pura Batu Bolong Sebagai Destinasi Wisata Hindu di Lombok’, Samvada : Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, Media, dan Public Relations, 4, pp. 97–117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53977/jsv.v4i2.3308.
Putri, Suryasiha, M. (2025) ‘Dinamika Healing sebagai Tren Pariwisata Spiritual ( Studi Fenomenologi di Liyer Spirit’, 13(1), pp. 139–149. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24843/JDEPAR.2025.v13.i01.p10.
Ruki, U. (2011) ‘Pengenalan Teori Servicescape dan Penerapannya dalam Desain Interior’, Humaniora, 2, p. 1225. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v2i2.3174.
Vukonic, B. (2015) ‘Religion, Tourism and Economics: A Convenient Symbiosis’, Tourism Recreation Research, 27, pp. 59–64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2002.11081221.
Wardani, I. (2025) ‘Komodifikasi Ritual Melukat Dalam Industri Pariwisata Bali : Implikasi Terhadap Nilai-Nilai Keagamaan’, PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, 4, pp. 7897–7908. Available at: https://doi.org/10.56799/peshum.v4i5.11457.
Widyastuti, I.G.A.A.A., Sugianthara, A.A.G. and Semarajaya, C.G.A. (2020) ‘Identifikasi kesesuaian tata letak tanaman berdasarkan konsep Tri Mandala (studi kasus Pura Puseh lan Desa, Desa Pakraman Batuan dan Desa Pakraman Kebon Singapadu)’, Jurnal Arsitektur Lansekap, 6(1), p. 43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24843/jal.2020.v06.i01.p05.
Published
2026-11-11
Section
Artikel